tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26129073.post5369532833993294058..comments2023-12-06T19:46:26.522-05:00Comments on The Greenbelt: One law for Us, one for ThemThe Ridger, FCDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01538111197270563075noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26129073.post-10165040609495107282012-04-17T15:10:22.390-04:002012-04-17T15:10:22.390-04:00And since SCOTUS says money is speech, clearly thi...And since SCOTUS says money is speech, clearly this is free speech.<br /><br />But the Constitution doesn't mean that much anymore.The Ridger, FCDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01538111197270563075noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26129073.post-38828824700894191982012-04-17T09:47:28.311-04:002012-04-17T09:47:28.311-04:00Regardless of whether any group is a "terrori...Regardless of whether any group is a "terrorist group", how is such a list and such a law <b>not</b> a blatant first-amendment violation? We've long made the point that unpopular speech is also protected, and that, while specific prohibitions can be acceptable, blanket prohibitions are clearly unconstitutional.<br /><br />And now... ?Barry Leibahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14205294935881991457noreply@blogger.com