How? Simple

Dan Froomkin asks, or rather passes on a question:

As Jonathan Chait recently asked in a Los Angeles Times opinion column: "[I]f Bush's own economists say his tax cuts caused revenue to drop . . . then how can he continually get away with insisting the opposite?"

I beleive that would be ...

Because nobody ever calls him on it, Dan and Jonathan.

Oh, maybe you are now. You. But for the last six years it was all 'gee, we can't call the President a liar!'

But you know what, media guys? Not calling him a liar doesn't make him not a liar. It just makes you enablers if not accomplices.