It's not the Dick...
Thinking about that R rating I got, and looking at some others at Science Blogs, I edited my template to lose the Philip K Dick ... well, the name, anyway. And guess what? Now I'm:
Mingle2 - Online Dating
This rating was determined based on the presence of the following words:
* death (9x)
* suicide (7x)
* hurt (3x)
* abortion (2x)
* shoot (1x)
So I guess it's not sex.
Labels: language, media, miscellaneous
3 Comments:
Wait, you REMOVED "Dick" and got a MORE RESTRICTIVE rating? Uh-huh.
That's why I never bother with any of those silly things.
Besides, any ratings system that doesn't distinguish, say, Philip K. Dick from Di*k Ch*ney would be quite useless.
Yep. Of course the refs to death and suicide had tripled, and some to shooting had been added.
Clearly, this rating isn't mostly about sex or profanity - death, danger, hurt, suicide, shooting: that's the problem.
Though any system that thinks this sentiment is "dangerous" to kids - To bereave a man of life... or by violence to confiscate his estate, without accusation or trial, would be so gross and notorious an act of despotism as must at once convey the alarm of tyranny throughout the whole nation; but confinement of the person, by secretly hurrying him to jail, where his sufferings are unknown or forgotten, is a less public, a less striking, and therefore a more dangerous engine of arbitrary government. - isn't trustworthy, anyway.
Mm, well, yes, rating for violence, rather than for sex, certainly makes more sense. I've always wondered why we'd, collectively (not I!) rather have our kids watch people being killed and maimed than have them watch people loving each other. But, then, I'm weird.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]