Wednesday, January 23, 2008

"Committed Christian" President

Huckabee adObama ad

I have mixed feelings about all this.

I think I know why they're doing it - and for both of them there's an exploitative element, even though Obama's probably partly fighting back against that evil "Manchurian candidate" attack.

But of course it's not only those two. They're just the most prominent examples- the candidates pushing their religion in our faces. (Romney's case is somewhat different; he's trying hard to be "a person of faith" without getting into the icky details.)

So, yeah, I think Obama's sincere in his religion, but I also think this is a trend we need to stop.

And this isn't just because I'm a freethinker (okay, you can call me an atheist if you like). Anybody who values their own particular brand of religion should be disturbed at the thought that we might elect someone who will push us just that much closer to the day when religious convictions are the key to electability. Sure, it's okay when it's your church, but what happens when the demographics shift?

And not only is it a profoundly un-American concept, it's dangerous.

Haven't we had enough of that?

Yeah, I know. Neither profound nor particularly original. But sometimes things just are what they are.

And check out Glenn Greenwald's take.

Labels: , , ,

2 Comments:

At 12:36 PM, January 24, 2008 Blogger Unknown had this to say...

Anybody who values their own particular brand of religion should be disturbed at the thought that we might elect someone who will push us just that much closer to the day when religious convictions are the key to electability. Sure, it's okay when it's your church, but what happens when the demographics shift?

I agree completely. Religion shouldn't be the focus. I understand if you want to focus on a specific moral or ethic that someone can agree or disagree with. But religion is so wishy-washy. Anyone can move the goalpost in a religious discussion so that it fits whatever they want it to.

Maybe that's why politicians are using it. They can claim to be a good "Christian", but then when asked to define it they can pander to the person they're talking to and change the ideals. Plus, in America anyway, "Christian" is something that brings a lot of people together as a word, but those people have vastly different definitions.

But it's wrong especially in a country that has clear tenants against religion and politics.

 
At 7:48 AM, January 27, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous had this to say...

James 4:4 a friend of the world is an enemy of God! so there's your answer. All in a nutsull!

We have 25 free online lessons in Chinese and English at
http://www.luomapinyin.com

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->