Monday, June 09, 2008

You want anecdotes? I got 'em.

Atlantic cover: Is Google making us Stoopid?The July/August Atlantic came yesterday. The cover story with the cute (though hardly original) but misleading title - misleading because it's not Google he blames, it's the whole Internet and the way everything on it is presented to us - is by Nicholas Carr, who complains that teh intertubes have ruined his ability to concentrate on anything longer than a couple of paragraphs:

"Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I'd spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That's rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do." (Nonetheless, I note, he manages to write a lengthy article that he apparently expects will find readers.)

He quotes a pathologist who says "I can't read War and Peace anymore. I've lost the ability to do that. Even a blog post of more than three or four paragraphs is too much to absorb."

Carr's next line is so very true: "Anecdotes alone don't prove much. And we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive answer."

But being so incapable of sustained concentration, he can't wait for them, so he just barrels on, intimating that it's not our fault, that the Internet has changed our brains and our very way of thinking. Scary stuff.

But anecdotes don't prove much. Or, as it's more frequently put, the plural of anecdote is not data. Still, he's got his anecdotes, so let me share mine.

I read 30 or 40 pages every day on the bus. And Saturday I read over 600 pages of prose (a couple of Alison Taylor novels - finished one and read the other straight through). I didn't find my mind wandering, get fidgety, lose the thread - in fact, I often get annoyed when the bus pulls into the station.

And you know I read a lot in the blogosphere.

So if you can't concentrate, if you can't keep your mind on hard stuff or sustained argument, don't blame the Internet. Just get back in practice.

Labels: ,

5 Comments:

At 9:46 AM, June 10, 2008 Blogger AbbotOfUnreason had this to say...

Sorry, I stopped reading after the first word. I can only read one word these days before losing my train of thought.

Every few years, we have to blame something new for the general lack of interest in thinking among our fellow humans. It used to be television's fault. Then it was specifically TV advertisers. Now it's the interthing.

I like to blame editors. It seems to me that books are no longer right-sized for their content. The authors are allowed to blather on and on without interference or direction. Maybe that's contributing?

 
At 9:48 AM, June 10, 2008 Blogger AbbotOfUnreason had this to say...

Sorry, I should have said the lack of editing. It's probably more the publishers than the editors

 
At 10:12 AM, June 10, 2008 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Way at the end of the article - long past the point where Carr himself would have stopped reading - he does mention that Socrates bemoaned the advent of literacy, feeling that people would stop using their memories.

It was always better in the Old Days™ - except of course for when we had it Much Worse, You Kids Are So Spoiled™...

 
At 12:41 AM, June 11, 2008 Blogger fev had this to say...

And their music -- it's just noise.

 
At 1:42 PM, June 11, 2008 Blogger Unknown had this to say...

I don't prefer to read long articles on the internet, but I love reading long pieces in print. It has more to do with being in a comfortable position on the couch or on my deck rather than in my computer chair (which sees much too much of me).

Everyone used to talk about a paperless society too, but that didn't happen and probably won't happen until e-readers get as convenient and inexpensive as paper print.

But back to the point of the post, yeah, I agree. People that can't read more than a few paragraphs couldn't have read more than a few paragraphs before the advent of the internet (or probably less).

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->