Saturday, July 19, 2008

Name Games

Oh, I see. It's a time horizon, not a time table. Petraeus says so:
The top American commander in Iraq is downplaying recent comments by Nouri al-Maliki on the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, claiming that the Iraqi prime minister wants “time horizons,” not timetables.

During an interview that aired Friday on MSNBC, Gen. David Petraeus cast al-Maliki’s growing assertiveness on the presence of US. troops as a positive sign of the government’s sovereignty while lauding Iraq’s improved military ability. But Petraeus indicated that doesn’t necessarily mean American troops will be able to leave by the end of next year, a goal many Democratic lawmakers favor.

“Again, what [al-Maliki] has said is not a timeline or a timetable. He said time horizons, which, again, we think that there's nothing wrong with talking about time horizons,” said Petraeus.
So, you see, it's very different from saying that we would like to begin withdrawing troops next year. Because of course that would be a time table, which would mean the terrorists win, but when al-Maliki says
"US presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes."
and
"Those who operate on the premise of short time periods in Iraq today are being more realistic. Artificially prolonging the tenure of US troops in Iraq would cause problems."
that's only a time horizon, and so the terrorists lose.

Got it.

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

At 6:30 PM, July 19, 2008 Blogger John B. had this to say...

Sometimes our stupid political discourse amuses me, but then I remember that these people hold real power.

 
At 9:18 PM, July 19, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous had this to say...

Time frame, time table, time horizon - just as long as they don't call it a time warp. :(

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->