Drop that Roget's
Today's Herb and Jamaal irritates me.
Dammit, Herb. I am so sick of people “us[ing] a thesaurus” and plugging one word into the space of another with no regard for register (the thugs threw him off the riparian bank) or worse for syntactic constraints (“They assisted him do it.” "She desired him for help". "They aided the resistance to upgrade weapons.")
Can “mover, engenderer, originator, producer, begetter, author” be used interchangeably with “creator”? Or “architect, deviser, shaper”? Or – the ones he’ll get under its first listing – “artist, artiste, maker, master, dauber, copyist, craftsman, artisan”? It would serve you right if he put “a dreamer consenting to dream of the actual world” [Santayana] where he’d had “creator” to start with (you know, something like "The "dreamer consenting to dream of the actual world" [Santayan] of the radio was not Marconi."). Too many people use thesauruses, dammit.
2 Comments:
I always have my thesaurus handy, for when my active vocabulary isn't active enough. But I know my parts of speech, the difference between constitute, comprise, and compose...
Wow, really? I couldn't write (at least not nearly as well) without a thesaurus, especially the translating. My 35¢ Roget's paperback from my youth is better than the newer editions, too!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]