Interesting

In today's print edition of the Washington Times is this oddly slanted headline:



What really grabbed me was that "Warriors". Really? Drone pilots are "warriors" now? But I also wanted to get the link. And look what happened on line? The headline and subheader got changed:

Obama war chiefs widen drone kill box
Lethality of collateral damage ‘must not be excessive’

A glance at the URL tells us that didn't happen as a result of two audiences or anything. Instead, someone decided to change it after it was posted.(p.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/dec/3/pentagon-gives-more-room-for-deadly-error-in-drone/). Someone must have had some second thoughts...

Perhaps, just perhaps that first headline didn't blame Obama enough, while implying that "deadly errors" actually occur?