Why indeed?
"A neighborhood dispute gets ugly. Why an off-duty police officer is accused of pulling his gun on his neighbor."
I so hate that style of teaser-writing. Why is he accused of it? Don't mean you'll tell the alleged reason he did it, not the alleged reason he's being accused of doing it?
Labels: media
2 Comments:
Sorry: I don't get what you're complaining about here. They can't say "Why he pulled his gun," because that presumes that he did. They're going to tell you why he's accused -- that is, the alleged reason he did it, as you say. No?
Now, if they said, "Why [he] is accused of allegedly pulling his gun," then that would be badly written.
The question here seems to be "why do they say he did it?" that isn't a questioning of whether he did it but their identification of him. It accepts that a gun was drawn and questions why they say it was him.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]