Sunday, September 30, 2012

The Week in Entertainment

Live: Turandot at the Met - a glorious performance - wonderful, opulent, gorgeous sets; so complex that the first intermission was actually longer than the first act. Lovely singing, too.

TV: Doctor Who's mid-season finale, while not perhaps brilliantly plotted, was still wonderful. Goodbye to Rory and Amy. Doctor: "It would take almost unimaginable power. What have we got? C'mon, tell me. What?" Amy (takes Rory's hand): "I won't let them take him. That's what we've got." And oh my god the two of them on the roof. And what an ending. Wow. Also The Middle and Modern Family new season premieres. Loved Sue's attempt to get  lost. Gave The Neighbors a shot - it was amusing and I'll try it again. Also tried Elementary, but I'm not sure I'll go back to it.I like Lucy Liu, but I'm not crazy about her costar, and the whole premise seems unmotivated to me.

Read: Calling Bernadette's Bluff, an intriguing book about an atheist philosophy professor at a Catholic women's university. Began The History of the Siege of Lisbon by Saramago - it's not about the siege of Lisbon, actually, it's about a proofreader. And it's marvellous.


Labels:

4 Comments:

At 12:53 AM, October 07, 2012 Anonymous Adrian Morgan had this to say...

I hated the Doctor Who mid-season finale. Actually, Season Seven as a whole has been pretty terrible, which is particularly disappointing given that Season Six was easily the best since the show was revived.

I only had a few reservations about Season Six. One, it made no sense that River could regenerate -- the TARDIS has enough magic powers already, and letting it bestow regenerative powers upon an unborn human baby just comes across as making a mockery of itself. Two, "Closing Time", with its ridiculous notion that a crying baby could prevent cyberneurosurgery. I hate that kind of stupid sentimentality in a plot. Plus several lesser reservations, such as misuse of the word "psychopath". But overall, two major reservations plus several lesser ones counts as an excellent score.

Season Seven has disappointed more often than not. Take the episode with the cubes -- it built up lots of suspense, but seconds after we learn who the villains are, the Doctor waves the sonic screwdriver and the whole world is fixed. And now, the mid season finale -- several scenes offended me, not least of which was the Doctor healing River's hand. The Doctor has never been able to heal wounds by willpower (otherwise it would be a VERY different show) but they put that in merely for the sake of some sentimental lines of dialogue.

As Tom Baker once said, "I always have major reservations."

 
At 1:40 AM, October 07, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

I expect that Moffat thinks River is the only person (except perhaps another Time Lord) he could heal. I have serious reservations about River all the way around, so I try not to judge eps with her in them too harshly. I rather liked The Power of Three, myself ... but I had some plot problems with The Angels Take Manhattan - perhaps most strongly with (a) how and why did Rory end up taken the first time; (b) did we know the Angels could inhabit other statues, like giant hollow ones? (c) how the hell does Liberty ever not have eyes on her? and finally (d) did we ever know the Angels sent people back in time? Plus, of course why can't the TARDIS land in New York again? But I forgive it all for the gorgeous character moments, especially Amy's choice to risk everything for a chance at Rory.

 
At 9:09 AM, October 07, 2012 Anonymous Adrian Morgan had this to say...

I think perhaps a disadvantage of season arcs (as they tend to do a lot of in the new series) is that a deficiency in plotting can infect the whole season, whereas in classic Doctor Who, there were at least as many bad stories, but each adventure was relatively isolated so in a sense it didn't matter. One remembers the stories one likes.

As for your points above, I agree with (b) among others, but the answer to (d) is "yes" -- that angels could send people back in time was established in "Blink", the very first Angel story.

 
At 9:57 AM, October 07, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Now I come to think of it, you're right about "Blink". I'd forgotten just what they did to you when they caught you.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Moveable Type


Yes - today is the anniversary of the first volume of the most influential Bible ever published: the one printed with Johan Gutenberg's moveable type - in 1542.

It was the beginning of a new age - an age of widespread information and literacy, and an end to the Church's monopoly on knowledge. The new printing process fueled the Renaissance and was a major catalyst for the scientific revolution. It may even have midwifed the Reformation. In short, it facilitated, if not outright produced, the end of the Middle Ages.

It is estimated that more books were produced in the 50 years after Gutenberg's invention than scribes had been able to produce in the 1,000 years before that.

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

At 5:18 PM, October 07, 2012 Blogger -blessed holy socks, the non-perishable-zealot had this to say...

While I'm a Roamin' Catholic and I do believe we should close Darfurget, I DO NOT simply believe we should close our eyes and forget the Upstairs Eternity God has so lavishly bestowed on U.S. I believe also both sides add a lotta spin to the crass news, so I look not to the whorizontal, but to God who bespeaketh nthn but the Truth. Lemme explain --- If God doesn’t exist, why do you hate Him so much? If God does exist, why don’t you follow us Home to Heaven Above if you‘re gonna croak as I am? How long do we have to enjoy this finite existence? 77ish, measly years? Compared to the length and breadth of eternity, 77ish years is like the micron of a nanometer in the whole, bloody, universe. Why don’t we have a BIG-ol, rokk-our-holy-soxx, party-hardy celebrating our resurrection for many eons? Heaven TOTALLY kicks-ass for eternity. Yes, God’s odd, yet, aren't we? Thank you proFUSEly, for the wick is running out on U.S. _thewarningsecondcoming.com_

 
At 5:40 PM, October 07, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Goodness, you couldn't find a freethought post to preach on? I'm tempted to delete this, but I won't ( though if you keep posting irrelevant comments - what does this have to do with Gutenberg? - I will)just so I can say your perfervid incoherence isn't particularly persuasive. Your "explanation" is just Pascal's Wager, which is worthless. What if the pagans are right? Why don't you follow the Triple Goddess?

I don't hate God. Do you hate unicorns, Thor, or Bertrand Russell's teapot? I do hate the Church, because I think it has done enormous damage. And I'm not crazy about believers who don't keep their faith to themselves and use it to destroy the lives of their fellow humans. God's not odd, he's nonexistant.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Friday, September 28, 2012

A Bold Move

People in Apartment 3G call each by name a lot - mostly because except for the three stars and possibly the bearded Greek professor it's very hard to tell them apart (also, they often don't look the same from day to day, or even panel to panel, but that's a different problem). This is particularly true of the men, all of whom are bland, white-bread types who are very easily mistaken for each other. But here, one of them makes a bold move to stand out: Evan, whose aunt Cathy is as mean to him as Margo is to ... well, everybody, has changed his hair color. I give him props for a subdued, natural auburn shade rather than carrots. But it won't matter. He may not die in the Himalayas like Margo's last boyfriend, but he will lose everything.

Evan is a blond

Evan is a ginger

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Gosh, who could it be?

Phrase Origins: On Feb. 22, 1918 Warren Harding said it is good to drink "at the fountains of wisdom inherited from" this alliterative group.

Ummmm, errrr, I dunno, could it be .... The Founding Fathers?


This is so totally a Jeopardy! question. Ask me who came up with the phrase, and I'd have no idea. I also thought it was older than that. But ask it like this, and what else is it going to be?

And ..... And yet, one didn't get it at all, and the other - yep. She got it - and so did I.

Labels:

1 Comments:

At 8:45 PM, September 27, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

I had exactly the same reaction (and answer) to tonight's Final Jeopardy! as you did. Humble brag alert: I'm ashamed to confess also solved last night's correctly as well (which none of the three contestants did).

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Some things are given

One of them is Yosemite + photography = Ansel Adams.

Yosemite - Ansel Adams

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At 8:47 PM, September 27, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

I was surprised she missed it, too. (Full disclosure: my roots in NorCal run deep, and I've been to Yosemite many times).

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

For No Especially Good Reason

Scalzi did this over at Whatever: For No Especially Good Reason I Put Each Letter of the Alphabet Into My Web Browser and Posted the Link it Autocompleted To, so why not me, too, I thought?

A was The Abominable Charles Christopher, a wonderful web comic.

B was Barnes & Noble - I buy books. (I'm surprised, sort of, that Amazon wasn't my A.)

C was Birds of North America at Cornell, hence the C.

D was Darths & Droids - webcomic with an amusing D&D version of Star Wars

E was Wikipedia - English-language Wikipedia.

F was Facebook - well, sure.

G was Google - it would have been a shock otherwise.

H was Headsup: the blog - "the deskly arts" and a straight look at what's going on in FoxLand, too.

I was Izvestiya - not my first site for Russian news, but I isn't a go-to letter.

J was The Comics Curmudgeon: the url is joshreads, for historical purposes. A great site for comics snark.

K was Kotomatritsa, cats and others captioned - in Russian. Usually good Russian, not Internet slang though that's there, often poetic.

L was Language Log, the linguistic blog.

M was Multitran - a Russian translation database, a wonderful resource.

N was The Conscience of a Liberal, Paul Krugman's blog at the New York Times's website.  I was a little surprised it wasn't the main NYT website, but then again, he posts a lot.

O was Orbitz - I travel.

P was Peapod - I have my groceries delivered. I love it.

Q was Dinosaur Comics at qwantz- a great web comic.

R was Robert Reich's blog - this surprised me. I like him, but I don't go there a lot. Must not use "R" that much.

S was Slactivist, a progressive evangelical who also does a mean take-down of Left Behind.

T was Talking Points Memo; it's a source I enjoy.

U was Webster's Unabridged. I look up words.

V was The New Adventures of Queen Victoria, another good web comic.

W was WMATA - the Washington Metro system. 

X was xkcd - I mean, what else?

Y was You Tube - duh.

Z was Arnold Zwicky's Blog , another language (mostly) blog.

Labels: , ,

1 Comments:

At 8:59 PM, September 27, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

"X was xkcd - I mean, what else?"

In my case, the website for the 17th meeting of Colloquium series, that I attended this year -- "x" for "XVII."

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, William

Today in 1906 Sir William Empson was born. He was a critic - one of the greatest English critics ever - and he also wrote poetry - complex and obscure but compelling.

Homage to the British Museum

There is a supreme God in the ethnological section;
A hollow toad shape, faced with a blank shield.
He needs his belly to include the Pantheon,
Which is inserted through a hole behind.
At the navel, at the points formally stressed, at the organs of sense,
Lice glue themselves, dolls, local deities,
His smooth wood creeps with all the creeds of the world.

Attending there let us absorb the cultures of nations
And dissolve into our judgement all their codes.
Then, being clogged with a natural hesitation
(People are continually asking one the way out),
Let us stand here and admit that we have no road.
Being everything, let us admit that is to be something,
Or give ourselves the benefit of the doubt;
Let us offer our pinch of dust all to this God,
And grant his reign over the entire building.


more poems here)

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Atomic City

atomic city postcard


irradiated liberty dime Hey! My home town was just a Jeopardy! answer. I remember the American Museum of Science and Energy back when it was the Museum of Atomic Energy, and you could get a radioactive dime after having your hair stood on end by the Van De Graffe generator!


van de graff generator






(and ps: doing multiple images in the new interface is as hard as I remember. grrrrr)

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At 10:16 AM, September 27, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

I was surprised that the guy from Vanderbilt missed this, weren't you?

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Ring tones

I forgot to mention that one of the things I like about Wallander is that everybody has a different ring tone on their phone. I hate shows where they all have the same, generic ring tone - very few phones I hear ringing could be mistaken for someone else's, even though that's a staple of "hahahaha" moments in tv and movies....

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At 10:20 AM, September 27, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

What a sad commentary on modern society that this has actually become something to be glad of. How I long for the days before cell phones, with less public noise pollution (including when we weren't subjected to strangers' private phone conversations), and when people didn't talk on the phone while trying to drive...

 
At 12:54 PM, September 27, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

I decided a long time ago that if I wouldn't be annoyed if both parties were there, why was I annoyed if only one was? Back when everybody yelled into their phones, it was bad, nowadays I don't much notice it.

And I wouldn't give up my cell phone for the days of being out of touch, stranded if I couldn't find a pay phone that hadn't been vandalized, or late to work in a traffic jam.

Talking while driving is different.

 
At 4:30 PM, September 27, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

I ADORE the freedom and defiance of being incommunicado whenever I set foot outside! Of course, I long ago came to hate talking on the phone at all, and now make at most perhaps two calls a week. Last time was to sing "Happy Birthday" to a 105-year-old family friend, since she doesn't do email, although she reports that her "baby sister" (who's "only" 85) does.

 
At 1:36 PM, September 28, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

Pre cell phones, when people were out in public alone, they were blessedly silent most of the time. No longer, alas.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, TS

Today in St Louis in 1888 TS Eliot was born. He wrote many poems, most famous perhaps "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" and "The Waste Land" - and of course "The Hollow Men", which begins "We are the hollow men" and ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.
He also wrote the source poems for "Cats". And many others, including these:
The Boston Evening Transcript

The readers of the Boston Evening Transcript
Sway in the wind like a field of ripe corn.
When evening quickens faintly in the street,
Wakening the appetites of life in some
And to others bringing the Boston Evening Transcript,
I mount the steps and ring the bell, turning
Wearily, as one would turn to nod good-bye to Rochefoucauld,
If the street were time and he at the end of the street,
And I say, "Cousin Harriet, here is the Boston Evening         Transcript."


Cousin Nancy

Miss Nancy Ellicott Strode across the hills and broke them,
Rode across the hills and broke them--
The barren New England hills--
Riding to hounds
Over the cow-pasture.

Miss Nancy Ellicott smoked
And danced all the modern dances;
And her aunts were not quite sure how they felt about it,
But they knew that it was modern.

Upon the glazen shelves kept watch
Matthew and Waldo, guardians of the faith,
The army of unalterable law.



More of his poems here

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Oh, my word

Seriously, this piece of word-substitution spam is the cyclopean of sublimity:

Singular of the most all the wild watches in the humankind are the Breitling watches. They’re known in the cyclopean of sublimity watches as the ace most abundant and this is the forgather why most of the celebrities as extravagantly as the on the qui vive through despite enthusiasts deficiency to associate themselves with these watches. The Breitling outcome watches are timely ascendancy of this sentiment additional enchanting be enamoured of of those nab note of enthusiasts who can’t forgoing the bizarre fish Breitling watches. The watchmakers producing these Breitling parroting watches in the dawning bone up on the unelaborated Breitling watches closely, after this they these days the clone Breitling watches that are the 100% exposition copies of these mount rebel ones. The Breitling emulating watches are produced uniquely owing the professionals who don’t insufficiency to compromise on fettle like the pilots.

Thesaurus users, beware! This is the end result - replacement gone wild!

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

There will be BLOOD

Okay, for some reason Margo is suddenly a busy public relations person, and this guy, Greg, is "ridiculously good-looking" but also annoys Margo a lot, especially since he horned in on her and Tommie's lunch with the Prof. Now he's out with Lu Anne - and he's trying to convince her that Margo is bad for her!

This will not end well. For Greg.

Greg says he's not surprised Margo had rules, plus she's bossy

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Agatha Christie won't turn to vinegar in the vault

So Sunday I watched a mystery movie that seems to be in a series called Mystery Woman - I don't remember what this entry was called. But it opened when the bookstore owner came in gloating over a first-edition Agatha Christie, for whom she had a buyer already lined up. Her ... partner? employee? token black character who (of course) had magical tech skills and also was (of course) much older than our heroine ... started bitching about people who buy first editions and wrap them in plastic and never read them. When you buy a bottle from a great vintage, he ranted, you don't let it turn to vinegar in your cellar; you drink it.

Well, yes. But two things occur to me. First, that first edition isn't going to go bad. As long as somebody's willing to pay for it, it will hold its value. Nobody's going to look at it and exclaim "Oh, you waited too long to read it! All the print has melted away!"

And second - how the hell does he know the owner of that book didn't buy a second copy to read?

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Whoa

Okay, yes, I am perfectly aware that there are still roughly six weeks to go. But look at this.

TPM Electoral College Scoreboard: Obama 328 Romney 191
Source: http://core.talkingpointsmemo.com/election/scoreboard

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, William

Today in 1897, William Faulkner was born. After around 15 years of being published and remaining fairly unknown, he was awarded the Noble Prize in Literature. This brought him to the attention of the public and the wider world, and he's now regarded as one of the most important writers in American literature.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Sunday, September 23, 2012

The Week in Entertainment

DVD: Two more of the William Hartnell Dr Who episodes - the underrated The Sensorites and The Keys of Marinus.

TV: A made for tv movie called Mystery Woman ... something; frankly, I've already forgotten the name of this one - they were running them all day long. It had one black character - the older guy (older so therec ould be no hint of romance between him and the white heroine) who worked for the heroine and did all kinds of techno-magic to help her solve the case (you know, hacking into computers, using his 'contacts' to get copies of corporate documents, finding car registrations... all the stuff that amateur sleuths can't do, really), so he was the standard Magic Negro. It was otherwise quite forgettable. Leverage summer finale, which was an interesting idea: two shows, one with Eliot, Hardison and Parker, and one with Nate and Sophie. The first was quite tense, with a lot of good character moments, mostly revolving around Eliot - Eliot and Parker, Eliot and Hardison, Eliot Now and Eliot Then - but a really nice ending for Hardison and Parker. And Adam Baldwin! But, unfortunately, I got jolted out of the story since the subway where they had the final showdown did not even begin to look like the DC Metro. (It's funny: there's also no "Greer Park" and no "Washington Union", but the visuals are what grab you.) Also unfortunately, not only was the second one all Nate and Sophie but it had Sterling. More, it had one of those 'oh they're being shot at now let's go back and show you how that happened' openings that I really don't like. Plus I guessed what the painting was from the first time Sophie got all coy about it. Still, the first episode was very entertaining. Final episode of Perception, not bad though with a hell of a coincidence. Also, kudos to them for promoting 'talk therapy' instead of just meds for schizophrenics, but I have to say that Daniel doesn't seem the type of patient who would really benefit: he's plenty motivated and integrated already. Ah well; it's tv. Wallander: the Dogs of Riga, which was bleak and tense and well-done. And the next-to-last of the first half of Doctor Who's season, The Power of Three. It was a lovely episode - so nice to see Kate Stewart! - with nice character moments for the Ponds (Williamses). Next week the Doctor says good-bye to Amy and Rory, and I'm going to miss them a lot. They've been building up to this (and I really like the notion that it's been ten years for them, underlined by their being gone from the party for weeks in their time but only minutes in Brian's), and I hope very much that Moffat doesn't kill either one of them.

Read: Telegraph Avenue by Michael Chabon. Lord, that man can write - the book pivots around a short section that is one long Saramago-ish sentence ... actually, not really, Saramago is fond of commas and Chabon's sentence was held together by more elaborate conjunction. The plot is complicated, the characters real, and if nothing brilliantly new is said, the book is still, if a little slow, ultimately captivating and enthralling.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At 11:58 PM, September 24, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

"Chabon's sentence was held together by more elaborate conjunction."

As one who's lately waged pitched battle with some less well constructed run-on sentences, I shudder at the plight of the translators who'll have to render that monstrosity into other languages.

 
At 12:55 PM, September 25, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Indeed. Slapping down commas is easy; dealing with complex embedding and subordination? Not so much.

 
At 12:08 AM, September 26, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

Don't forget to contemplate how that sentence will read after being rendered into another language by Google Translate or another program its ilk. BTW, I just received a favorite Azorean author's latest book from him last week, which includes a three-page short story that's all one sentence. I'd hazard that our profession is secure for a few more years.

 
At 1:04 AM, October 07, 2012 Anonymous Adrian Morgan had this to say...

An interesting thing I noticed years ago about The Sensorites (and like to mention occasionally when it's on-topic): you know how the element molybdenum plays a central role in the plot? Well, in the novelised version of the story, the page number on which the word "molybdenum" first appears is forty-two ... which is equal to the atomic number of molybdenum! Isn't that neat?

For what it's worth, my favourite Hartnell story (going by the realisation on-screen and not just the plot) is "The Romans".

 
At 1:42 AM, October 07, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Yes, The Romans is excellent. all the way around.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday to the Music Men

John Coltrane Ray Charles
The Boss
Today was a good day for music! John Coltrane (1926), Ray Charles (1930), and Bruce Springsteen (1946), all!

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Euripides

This is the day we celebrate the birth of one of ancient Greece's greatest dramatists, Euripides. He reshaped Attic drama by featuring petty and uncaring gods, flawed but human heroes, strong women, and smart slaves.

Of his more than 90 plays, only 19 survive (or is "only" the right word? That's more than from Aeschylus and Sophocles together), among them Alcestis, The Bacchae, Elektra, Iphigenia At Aulis, Iphegenia in Tauris, Medea, and The Trojan Women.

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Friday, September 21, 2012

Fat cat is my

A student was joking about how learning Spanish was taking away from "time spent crafting my Russian translations". She added that she had had to create a sentence with "ay caramba" and, "as I only know about six words", was finding it difficult. She came up with ¡Ay caramba! ¡Mi gato es mas gordo! and added "this either means my cat is too fat or my cat is very fat, I'm not sure which. But it got me high fives from the other students. I was totally floating on cloud nueve."

Another of the Russian class suggested it meant "my cat is more fat". (This, by the way, is correct.)

According to Google translate, it just means "my cat is fat", which is what "mi gato es gordo" also means.

But why I'm posting this is that GT suggested I translate "mi gato es gordo" from Portuguese. Why not?, I figured, and clicked.

According to Google Translate, "mi gato es gordo" is Portuguese for "fat cat es mi."

Okay, I get that Portuguese isn't Spanish. ("My cat is fat" is "meu gato é gordo", in case you're wondering.) But I don't know why GT suggested I translate from a language that 50% of the words didn't belong to. And I don't get why the word order was so drastically changed.

I don't get how machine translation purports to work at all, in fact...

Labels: , , ,

1 Comments:

At 1:46 PM, September 21, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

And this, ladies and germs, is why human translators don't fear becoming obsolete any time soon, no matter how highly computer translating is hyped!

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Back on form

David Brooks is back in his comfort zone. He had to address the Boca Moment, of course, and he managed to admit there was a lot wrong with what Romney said - though even then he had to add that
Sure, there are some government programs that cultivate patterns of dependency in some people. I’d put federal disability payments and unemployment insurance in this category.
(Those people who get disabled just to get that awesome federal payout!)

But today he's back on form, penning an admiring column about "risk-takers" "at the top", telling us that
Prosperity is often driven by small enclaves of extraordinary individuals that build new industries and amass large fortunes. These driven, manic individuals are frequently unpleasant to be around. But, if your country is not attracting and nurturing them, you’re cooked.
He also tells us that today, things are bad bad bad in the US:
Today, grandiosity is out of style. We’ve just been through a financial crisis fueled by people who got too big for their britches. We’ve got an online and media culture that specializes in ridiculing grand people.

Caution rules. The number of jobs created by business start-ups under President Obama is much lower than under the three previous presidents. The World Economic Forum ranks the competitiveness of nations, and the U.S. has lost ground in each of the last four years.
He cheers for tax breaks and government giving money to these "grand" people, these "few ridiculously ambitious people"... and manages not to mention that in that WEF report ranking (I'll link to it; he didn't - ranking is on page 15-16), the countries beating us are Switzerland, Singapore, Sweden, and Finland, and other countries moving up in the rankings are Denmark, the Netherlands and the UK. Rounding out the top ten are yes, the US, and also Germany and Japan. I see a lot of countries there that are dedicated to Eurosocialism and taking care of the bottom of their societies. He also manages not to mention that one factor depressing the US at the moment is our penchant for fighting this Endless War, which is sucking money out of the economy faster than we can comprehend.

In other words, he's back to telling us the Republicans are right in celebrating the rich, because they're the drivers of capitalism, which is perfect, and without them getting anything they want, they'll pick up their jobs and go home.

Though his poster boy in this article? Came here from Canada, and to Canada from South Africa. So I guess we do attract them, somehow...

Labels: , ,

2 Comments:

At 8:38 AM, September 21, 2012 Anonymous Mark had this to say...

It's hard to comprehend how much of an idiot Brooks is. It seems contrary to nature.

 
At 2:33 PM, September 21, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Isn't that the truth?

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Thursday, September 20, 2012

New Interface Is Still Not Good

So, when I posted the last post, I discovered that Blogger/Google has finally forced me into the new interface.

I don't like it one bit.

It's far too full of white space, and you have to do way too much clicking on fiddly side-menus to do things. Plus, it doesn't look like it has changed a bit since they announced it, including the so-called Preview.

Way not to be evil, there.

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At 8:04 PM, September 25, 2012 Blogger Jan had this to say...

Amen, sister. It looks just the same as the preview; it's hard to read (low contrast, indifferent "design" with, as you say, useless white space your eye has to search around); and it's hard to navigate (same reasons). Time for another hosting service? If only I weren't so lazy ...

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Maybe, but so what?

Today I was at a little conference talking about, among other things, how to get language learners to high levels - 3 or above - on the ILR scale. At a session about what those learners who get to 4+ or above (comparable to WEHANS, the Well-Educated Highly Articulate Native Speaker) have in common, someone asked a question about getting people to higher levels in their second (third, fourth...) language who don't function at high levels in their native language. (Answer: you can do it but it's hard and almost always involves getting them more proficient in the native language first.)

Anyway, this brought out a lot of the computer-game-disparaging, lazy-kids-these-days comments. I said something then, and I'd like to say it here, too.

First, yes, I have those students. They don't know what's going on in the articles they're translating - don't know the culture, don't know the events - and mostly they don't care. They can't even be bothered to research (you know, a quick Google of "Yashin bribery scandal" or "Stalin Russian metro" or "Bandera Hero Ukraine"). They will, with a straight face, write "US Finance Minister Timothy Gaytner".  More than that, they don't read (interestingly, there are three things these high-achieving learners share: most (not all) come from multilingual neighborhoods - note, not multilingual families; they're almost all tenacious, detail-oriented (ectenic) learners; and they all - all - read voraciously.) These students don't read non-fiction (some don't read fiction, but most do - genre, though, not 'literature'). They don't read analysis in English - Will or Friedman, Sowell or Kristoff, anybody. They don't read anything more complex than the front page and sports section of USA Today. And that means they have a hard time of it.

But.

That is neither new nor uniquely American. When we talk about the competency of the high-level learner, we don't just say "native speaker". We aren't just talking about the man in the street, the field, the coal mine, or the factory. We have to specify his attributes and qualify them with adverbs that describe superlativeness: not just educated but well educated; not just articulate but highly articulate. In any country at any time the percentage of people living in it that are both of those things is quite small.

So yes, it's true: many of our students don't read, and don't know a lot about the larger world around them. But that doesn't make them different from most people around the world. When we talk to them about what they need to do to get better, we need to remember that it's not their generation or even their country that's to blame.

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Stevie

Today in Hull, in Yorkshire, England, in 1902 Stevie Smith was born.
Stevie Smith


My Heart Was Full

My heart was full of softening showers,
I used to swing like this for hours,
I did not care for war or death,
I was glad to draw my breath.



In the Night

I longed for companionship rather,
But my companions I always wished farther.
And now in the desolate night
I think only of the people i should like to bite.

more Stevie Smith poems here

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

How big it was


xkcd today. Wow. How long did that take to draw?

xkcd raptors in the grass

In case you're lost, or just want to see what you might have missed, here's a full-screen version that you can zoom in and out on.


Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

But?

A TPM story about Romney's donors hoping he will make himself likeable had this odd sentence in it:
Romney rebuffed suggestions that he should help voters get to know him by appearing on television shows, but Romney insisted that “The View” was too “high risk” and said accepting an invite from “Saturday Night Live” would have made him appear un-presidential.
But? Why on earth "but"?

But is a contrastive or adversative conjunction; what follows it should contradict in some way what comes before it. Here, what comes after it amplifies what came before it, giving examples of his rebuttal.

This sentence cries out for a nice semicolon. Or perhaps a non-finite "insisting" and "saying".

Labels: , ,

1 Comments:

At 5:00 PM, September 19, 2012 Anonymous Mark had this to say...

Maybe "rebuffed" was the wrong word. It definitely jars.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, David


Illya Kuryakin
Born today in 1933 - David McCallum (my first tv crush, as Illya Kuryakin of course!) It's good to see he's still working.

Ducky

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

At 8:41 AM, September 19, 2012 Anonymous Mark had this to say...

I always liked David McCallum. It's hard to see him as an old man, but then it's hard to see myself as an old man, too. Of course he's waaa-aa-aay older than me. And it is great that he's still working. And it's great that the original David McCallum is still there, behind that mask of old age.

 
At 12:40 PM, September 19, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

Getting older is vastly preferable to the alternative. And goodness knows McCallum can still deliver even the simplest line with such eloquence.

I heard Terry Gross interview him on "Fresh Air" some years ago (probably when "NCIS" was new), and seem to recall that his father was a violinist and symphony conductor, so David grew up around classical music, for whatever that's worth -- quite a lot, IMHO.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Happy Birthday, Sam


Born this day in 1709 in Lichfield, England, that great lexicographer and writer, Dr Samuel Johnson, who was also the subject of the first great biography in English.

During a conversation with his biographer, Johnson became infuriated at the suggestion that Berkeley's idealism - the theory that individuals can only directly know sensations and ideas of objects, not abstractions such as "matter" - could not be refuted. In his anger, Johnson powerfully kicked a nearby stone and proclaimed "I refute it thus!"

A much quoted man, he also said:
It is better to suffer wrong than to do it, and happier to be sometimes cheated than not to trust.

The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good.

Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or we know where we can find information on it.
And his Boswell (Boswell) reported this:
Patriotism having become one of our topicks, Johnson suddenly uttered, in a strong determined tone, an apophthegm, at which many will start: "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel." But let it be considered that he did not mean a real and generous love of our country, but that pretended patriotism which so many, in all ages and countries, have made a cloak of self- interest.
And I can't resist... lolexicographer Johnson (from Jeff Prucher):

in ur libraries

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At 12:50 PM, September 18, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

"And his Boswell (Boswell) reported..."

Thanks, that made my day!

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Monday, September 17, 2012

Happy Birthday, William

William Carlos Williams, great American poet, born today in 1883. Like a superhero with a secret identity, he was a doctor by day and poet by night, writing lines of deceptive simplicity.

Winter Trees

All the complicated details
of the attiring and
the disattiring are completed!
A liquid moon
moves gently among
the long branches.
Thus having prepared their buds
against a sure winter
the wise trees
stand sleeping in the cold.

Blizzard

Snow:
years of anger following
hours that float idly down --
the blizzard
drifts its weight
deeper and deeper for three days
or sixty years, eh? Then
the sun! a clutter of
yellow and blue flakes --
Hairy looking trees stand out
in long alleys
over a wild solitude.
The man turns and there --
his solitary track stretched out
upon the world.

(More poems here and poems and short bio here)

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Sunday, September 16, 2012

The Week in Entertainment

Film: The Beloved (Les Bien-aimés), a wonderful French meditation on love, affection, desire, and obsession, spanning forty years and two generations - mother and daughter in a possible stunt casting of Catherine Deneuve and her actual daughter Chiara Mastroianni, both of whom provide compelling performances - of women who have, and inspire, life-long passions (alas, these don't meet in the same men) that they can't, somehow, resolve into relationships that work.

DVD: The Space Museum and The Chase, early Doctor Whos with William Hartnell. I always did love Barbara and Ian, and these were their last episodes. Museum is a fascinating failure, ep 1 raising lots of questions the rest of it resolutely refuses to address, but Chase is cracking good fun.

TV: Leverage - very nice look at Parker. I love how she fixed everybody. "Nice job," indeed. But waaaaah that it's the summer finale next week already. Frogs - how strange; I could have sworn that the frogs stomped Ray Milland to death on the lawn, but it's in the living room. The Belle of New York, an utterly light-weight Astaire-Vera-Ellen vehicle. Perception - first half of the season finale, which is rather confusing so far. Apparently absolutely nothing they showed us after the murder happened. That's ... kind of a cheat. Part two better redeem itself. Doctor Who: "Why would he want to kill you? Unless he's met you?" The Doctor is getting darker again - last week's killing of Solomon (much as he deserved it), this week's willingness to condemn Jex. Amy called it - and we've seen it in the past, particularly with Ten: the Doctor doesn't have companions because he gets lonely, but because he becomes mad and dangerous when he "travel[s] alone for too long." (Plus, how lovely to see Ben Browder again.)

Read: Finished Dear Blue Sky, which was very good. The Pigeon Pie Mystery, quite an entertaining novel. Began Michael Chabon's Telegraph Avenue, which is pretty good so far.

Labels:

1 Comments:

At 6:15 AM, September 17, 2012 Anonymous Anonymous had this to say...

I too like Barbara and Ian. The actress who played Barbara reappears as some sort of jungle goddess in one of the Tom Baker episode--Megalos, says imdb. I was very excited when I saw it and recognized her. I've seen Ian somewhere too since then--from his listing on imdb, it was probably in a Blackadder episode.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

A few more flutterbys

Almost the last week I'll be at the College Park office. Here are a few butterflies and skippers, including one I've never seen (or at least not to know) before: an American snout - the source of the name is obvious!

American snout

American snout

Next, a Pearl crescent

pearl crescent
And two Tiger swallowtails, one much the worse for wear

raggedy tiger swallowtail

tiger swallowtailA slightly tattered Painted Lady

painted ladyA Common buckeye

buckeye And three skippers, one largish (for skippers) Silverspotted

silverspotted skipper

A sachem

sachem

And a Peck's skipper

peck's skipper

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

At 3:56 AM, September 25, 2012 Anonymous Stan had this to say...

These are lovely. I like the Pearl Crescent especially, the play of sunlight on its markings.

The swallowtails' swallow-tails make them seem quite large, though they probably aren't. We don't have these in Ireland, I think, though there are hairstreaks with similar but much shorter protruberances.

 
At 11:35 AM, September 25, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Thank you. I like the crescent a lot myself.

Tiger swallowtails are our largest butterfuly (the US). They're 5.5-6 inches across, nearly 6 times as big as a hairstreak.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Lauren

Lauren Bacall
Born today in 1924, in New York City, Betty Joan Perske, much better known as Lauren Bacall.

That smoldering look, that husky voice...

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Saturday, September 15, 2012

You know what? There are people who do!

Brian Switek, a paleontologist who blogs (engagingly) at Laelaps, was called out by Answers in Genesis for his critique of the dinosaurs in last week's Doctor Who. I don't read AiG - who has the time? - but I did follow his link. Here's the final blow:
The Bible records God’s eyewitness account that he created flying creatures—which includes of course birds—the day before He created land animals—which includes dinosaurs—and man. Thus only the grossest of biblical compromise can suppose that birds evolved from anything, including dinosaurs.
Well. Sophisticated theologians like to argue that many of the New Atheists fight a strawman, that no one really believes the Bible is literally true. All I can say is, they need to talk to the fine folks at AiG and their co-religionists around the world. Plenty of people do, indeed, believe just that.

Labels: , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Why aren't they grateful?

Another sobering read from Glenn Greenwald, at his new digs at the Guardian, on why it's baffling that Americans can't understand why Mid-Eastern Muslims in Egypt and Libya and other places aren't "grateful" to us:

But to act as though Muslim anger toward the US and Israel is primarily the by-product of crazy conspiracy theories is itself a crazy conspiracy theory. It's in the world of reality, not conspiracy, where the US and Israel have continuously brought extreme amounts of violence to the Muslim world, routinely killing their innocent men, women and children. Listening to Engel, one would never know about tiny little matters like the bombing of Gaza and Lebanon, the almost five-decade long oppression of Palestinians, the widely hated, child-killing drone campaign, or the attack on Iraq.

And it's in the world of reality, not conspiracy, where the US really has continuously interfered in their countries' governance by propping up and supporting their dictators. Intense Muslim animosity toward the US, including in Egypt, long pre-dates this film, and the reasons aren't hard to discern. That's precisely why the US supported tyranny in these countries for so long: to ensure that the citizens' views, so contrary to US policy, would be suppressed and rendered irrelevant.

It doesn't take a propagandized populace to be angry at the US for such actions. It takes a propagandized populace to be shocked at that anger and to view it with bafflement and resentment on the ground that they should, instead, be grateful because we "freed" them.

Indeed.

Murderous rioting is never right - it is in fact a horrible wrong - but pretending it comes out of the blue, or that a horrible movie is more than a spark to long- and well-laid tinder, just invites another one in another while.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Bobby

Bobby Short
Bobby Short, an extraordinary interpreter of the great American songbook, was born today in 1924. Thanks for the music, Bobby, you were always a delight to listen to...

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Friday, September 14, 2012

A power greater

Here's a nice quote a friend sent me:
"What is it that gives ordinary businessmen a power greater than that of the government? It is the capacity for giving or withholding money—nothing else in the world. This is the weapon that Satan chose from the beginning to place him and his plans beyond politics, and it has worked with deadly effect. There is only one thing in man's world that can offer any check on the unlimited power of money—and that is government. That is why money always accuses government of trying to destroy free agency, when the great enslaver has always been money itself."

-- Hugh Nibley, "Beyond Politics"

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

С днем рождения, Дмитрий Анатольевич!

MedvedevToday is Dmitry Medvedev's birthday. He was born in 1965, which makes him much younger than me, or even my baby brother... which is depressing, since he's prime minister and second man in a team running a whole country. Ah well...

A well-intentioned man in a hard job, in hard times. I wish him the best. Всего хорошего: успехов, радости, здоровья, и счастья!

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

At 8:58 AM, September 14, 2012 Anonymous Mark had this to say...

Just the other day I was talking to my dentist about having braces as a kid and she mentioned how much progress had been made. Then I realized that I got my braces 50 years ago. Medvedev wasn't even born then. Sheesh. I am getting old.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Painted Lady

Vanessa cardui, the lovely Painted Lady butterfly, one of the world's most common. It's a brushfoot, or four-footed butterfly - see how the first pair of legs is so reduced as to be unnoticeable. Painted Lady butterfly

Painted Lady butterfly

Painted Lady butterfly

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Biggest Arms Dealer

Via , Tom Dispatch, this report on the US's arms trade (my emphasis):
Overseas weapons sales by the United States totaled $66.3 billion last year, or more than three-quarters of the global arms market, valued at $85.3 billion in 2011. Russia was a distant second, with $4.8 billion in deals.
So at least our trade balance is good in the war-and-death sector.

But it's more troubling than that. We, as a nation, are promoting war as the first choice to solve any problem, while simultaneously disengaging from anything beyond a rote, yellow-ribbon style of "supporting the troops". As Tom says:

It would, by the way, be a snap to construct a little quiz like this every couple of weeks from U.S. military news that’s reported but not attended to here, and each quiz would make the same essential point: from Washington’s perspective, the world is primarily a landscape for arming for, garrisoning for, training for, planning for, and making war. War is what we invest our time, energy, and treasure in on a scale that is, in its own way, remarkable, even if it seldom registers in this country.

In a sense (leaving aside the obvious inability of the U.S. military to actually win wars), it may, at this point, be what we do best. After all, whatever the results, it’s an accomplishment to send 200 Marines to Guatemala for a month of drug interdiction work, to get those Global Hawks secretly to Australia to monitor the Pacific, and to corner the market on things that go boom in the night.

Think of it this way: the United States is alone on the planet, not just in its ability, but in its willingness to use military force in drug wars, religious wars, political wars, conflicts of almost any sort, constantly and on a global scale. No other group of powers collectively even comes close. It also stands alone as a purveyor of major weapons systems and so as a generator of war. It is, in a sense, a massive machine for the promotion of war on a global scale.

We have, in other words, what increasingly looks like a monopoly on war. There have, of course, been warrior societies in the past that committed themselves to a mobilized life of war-making above all else. What’s unique about the United States is that it isn’t a warrior society. Quite the opposite.

Washington may be mobilized for permanent war. Special operations forces may be operating in up to 120 countries. Drone bases may be proliferating across the planet. We may be building up forces in the Persian Gulf and “pivoting” to Asia. Warrior corporations and rent-a-gun mercenary outfits have mobilized on the country’s disparate battlefronts to profit from the increasingly privatized twenty-first-century American version of war. The American people, however, are demobilized and detached from the wars, interventions, operations, and other military activities done in their name. As a result, 200 Marines in Guatemala, almost 78% of global weapons sales, drones flying surveillance from Australia -- no one here notices; no one here cares.


Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Roald

dahl and dogs
Born today in 1916, one of the great children's authors ever

(More of his poetry here)





The Rowing Song

Round the world and home again
That's the sailor's way
Faster faster, faster faster

There's no earthly way of knowing
Which direction we are going
There's no knowing where we're rowing
Or which way the river's flowing

Is it raining, is it snowing
Is a hurricane a–blowing

Not a speck of light is showing
So the danger must be growing
Are the fires of Hell a–glowing
Is the grisly reaper mowing

Yes, the danger must be growing
For the rowers keep on rowing
And they're certainly not showing
Any signs that they are slowing.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Bill

Bill Monroe
One hundred years ago today, on a farm near Rosine, Kentucky the Father of Bluegrass, Bill Monroe, was born.

Here are three videos featuring his distinctive mandolin and high, lonesome sound.

Do enjoy.






Uncle Pen:


Blue Moon of Kentucky:


Wayfaring Stranger:

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Happy Birthday, Stanislaw

Stanislaw Lem
Today in Lviv - then in Poland though now in Ukraine - in 1921, Stanislaw Lem was born. After WWII he basically invented the genre of far-future science fiction, using it to explore philosophical themes in an often satirical fashion. In the west, his best known novel is probably Solaris, but His Master's Voice and Fiasco, along with the Cyberiad, are also well known.

A couple of years ago, the (I think excellent) Russian film version of Solaris was cited as the definitive example of кино арт-хаус (kino art-khaus, art house film) by one of my students - we were discussing the translation of an article about Fyodor Bondarchuk, not an art-house director.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

American values

So, Mitt Romney believes that condemning an attack on religion is against American values?

Or is it against American values to call Islam a religion?

Or is what's against American values the admission that sometimes an American will do something repugnant?

Is he saying that if he were president, his State Department would have issuing a statement saying "Now that's what I'm talking about!" as a two-thumbs-up review of the movie?

Gah. I always did think he was a sociopath.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, HL

HL Mencken

Born today in 1880, the irascible and splendid Sage of Baltimore, HL Mencken.

"I believe that it is better to tell the truth than a lie. I believe it is better to be free than to be a slave. And I believe it is better to know than to be ignorant."

"It is impossible to imagine the universe run by a wise, just and omnipotent God, but it is quite easy to imagine it run by a board of gods. If such a board actually exists it operates precisely like the board of a corporation that is losing money."

"The worst government is the most moral. One composed of cynics is often very tolerant and humane. But when fanatics are on top there is no limit to oppression."

"The only way to reconcile science and religion is to create something which isn't science or something which isn't religion."

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Up into the building

up into the buildingI was at work that day, and spent much of it in a parking lot as they tried to evacuate our building in nothing flat. But, really, who am I, that anybody cares where I was or what I was doing?

Still, here's what I think about:


A man describing making his way down the stairs from the 67th floor of the North Tower:

"And then when we got to around the 35th floor we had to move over for the firefighters. I mean, we were all trying to get out, and here they came, up into the building."


Labels: ,

3 Comments:

At 1:05 PM, September 11, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

I was safe at home studying that day, but wondered why one of the planes flew within about 10 miles of us, and why they'd crash it into an empty field about an hour's drive away. I also dreaded that there was a fifth plane, and if so, where it currently was, where it was headed, and when it would get there.

 
At 1:11 PM, September 11, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

Here's a reminiscence of that day by a local newspaper columnist:
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/tony-norman/91101-began-as-glorious-day-and-then-652746
Journalists, too, race up to (if not necessarily into) catastrophes from which most sane people would flee.

 
At 9:48 PM, September 11, 2012 Blogger Bonnie had this to say...

Tom Paxton wrote a wonderful song, "The Bravest" (good version on YouTube) -- "Now every time I try to sleep, I'm haunted by the sound / Of firemen running up the stairs as we were running down."

It still makes me weep. I hope it always does.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Monday, September 10, 2012

Children chased by bison - duh

So I caught this video on CBS news tonight. Children walking up to pet a bison and getting chased.

Man. I was just in Yellowstone a month and a half ago. You cannot get out of your car without seeing a half a dozen signs telling you to keep your damned distance from all animals, especially bison. Like this one, though it's from Theodore Roosevelt National Park:

beware of bison sign

They aren't kidding. Do not send your children up to pet a bison. Just .... don't.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At 8:40 PM, September 10, 2012 Blogger Barry Leiba had this to say...

I used to work with a woman who got a degree in forestry and did an internship as a park ranger, before she changed gears and went into computers. She told me that during her internship, the single task that she and her supervisor spent more time doing than any other was warning people to stay away from the wild animals.

She also said that it was amazing how often the people would disbelieve them and argue with them about it.

 
At 7:30 AM, September 11, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Yep. My friend bought a book called "Death in Yellowstone" - full of people doing stupid things with animals and geysers and blizzards.

"They couldn't be dangerous or you wouldn't be allowed to let them run around loose."

 
At 12:56 PM, September 11, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

Re wild animals, I sometimes wonder if people don't realize why they're described as "wild." In fact, that should suffice to answer any and all questions of why not to try to interact with them (especially in mating season), although it doesn't always, alas. Then again, invoking Darwin, if everyone who's that stupid got mauled to death by a wild animal, eventually their ilk would go extinct (except for a few new mutants).

 
At 12:59 PM, September 11, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

Barry, did you see my reply to you re a use for the un-F-word this summer (currently the last comment)?
thegreenbelt.blogspot.com/2012/06/coining-not-exactly.html

 
At 1:25 PM, September 11, 2012 Blogger Barry Leiba had this to say...

I did (yes, rather like un-ringing a bell), though I didn't have any particular reply to it. Very appropriate usage, that.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Sunday, September 09, 2012

The Week in Entertainment

Film: The Words, which I think, after seeing it, got some bum reviews. Not the best movie I've seen, certainly, but I didn't think it was as flawed as most reviewers did (though I could have done without the peculiarly aggressive student character played by Olivia Wilde). Jeremy Irons was great, as usual.

DVD: City of Death, a nice Doctor Who written by Douglas Adams. Tried to watch The Tree of Life, but found it too confusing and pretentious and gave up on it after about half an hour. May try again...

TV: Doctor Who is back! Yay!. I was quite upset that it started with Rory and Amy getting a divorce, but it's believable and I loved the ending - all the Daleks shouting "Doctor who? Doctor who?" Wonderful! And the second episode - "Dinosaurs on a Spaceship!" - was great, too. Loved Rory's dad, and it had such great lines ("Are you suggesting dinosaurs are flying a spaceship?" "No, that would be ridiculous. They're probably just passengers.") Leverage, caught up on last week's - cute, I enjoy the ones where they do historical dress-up, and I liked how they subverted the "Eliot will be the bad guy" expectation. This week's was good, too. Back to their real strength: taking down an arrogant crook. Please Believe Me, a funny mistaken-identity romcom from 1950 with Deborah Kerr as a presumed heiress crossing the Atlantic on a liner, and Robert Walker, Peter Lawford, and Mark Stevens as the men chasing her. I can never get used to Robert Walker as a romantic lead... And the classic The Awful Truth with Irene Dunn and Cary Grant getting a divorce and sabotaging each other's new relationships. The Fairy King of Ar, an more than acceptable children's fantasy about some American kids on vaction saving some imprisoned fairies - Corbin Bernsen and Malcolm McDowell, believe it or not (also Glynis Barber). Spinning Boris, which is a "fact-based" look at American election advisers helping Yeltsin win reelection in 1996. It was intriguing if the basing was perhaps a bit light. Hop, which was not entirely predictable, but I think will be quite forgettable.

Read: The Lives of Things, short stories by José Saramago. Also his The Tale of the Unknown Island. The Second Life of Abigail Walker, a very nice story about a girl turning her life around by walking away from the mean girls she wanted for her friends and finding friends who want her. The American Way of War, a depressing book by Tom Engelhardt. And began Dear Blue Sky, a YA about a girl who begins corresponding with an Iraqi blogger after her brother enlists in the Marines in 2006. I'm not very far into it, but it's quite good.

Labels:

4 Comments:

At 1:02 PM, September 11, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

You didn't watch the first episode of season 3 of "Wallander"?

 
At 1:07 PM, September 11, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

It is on the DVR and it will be watched this week. Absolutely!

 
At 1:07 PM, September 11, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

Did you catch "Wagner's Dream" on PBS last night, re the Met's mounting of a new "Ring" Cycle? Next up, the operas themselves on the small screen (same ones shown live in movie theaters).

 
At 1:12 PM, September 11, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

I saw that in the theater, actually. am currently waiting impatiently for the DVD set this fall. Christmas early for me!

Though the filmed versions fail slightly when it comes to things (effects, makeup) designed for the last row of the back balcony, which may perhaps be mitigated by the small screen. It's a wonderful Ring, though - I wasn't overwhelmed by Brunhilde, but the other principals were excellent to brilliant.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Leo (С днем рождения, Лев Николаевич)

Лев Николаевич Толстой, or Leo Tolstoy as he's known in English, was born today (or August 28 Old Style) in 1828 on his family's estate in Yasnaya Polyana. His family was aristocratic (he was a count, or graf) and he lived wildly as a youth, running through a great deal of money. He also served in the army, participating in the defense of Sevastopol during the Crimean War. After his marriage he settled down in an austere lifestyle and wrote... War and Peace and Anna Karenina, and the lesser-known works such as Resurrection, The Death of Ivan Ilych, and After the Ball. Ivan Bunin called his unfinished novel The Cossacks one of the finest pieces of Russian prose ever written. In his later life he became a Christian anarchist (though he disliked the term), a pacifist, and (in Gandhi's words) "the greatest apostle of non-violence that the present age has produced", and the founding president of the International Union of Vegetarian Esperantists.

Read him in Russian here, and in English here.

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Saturday, September 08, 2012

The line and the Flash Pass

Via Slacktivist, a wonderful metaphor of America - and I'm not joking. Read it.

Labels: ,

4 Comments:

At 8:08 PM, September 08, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

What's your view on business fliers who pay for special passes to expedite them through TSA in airports?

 
At 8:20 PM, September 08, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

I find them somewhat annoying, but bottom line: I've never missed a flight because of them, and I've never lost a seat because of them. To my mind, that's the difference with the Flash Pass this person was describing: those people were interfering with and in some cases denying the experience others had paid for.

 
At 10:46 AM, September 09, 2012 Anonymous Kathie had this to say...

Good points. It might be different if there were an airline policy that enabled them to swan up to the counter at the last minute and bump us budget-fare fliers from our flights, even if we'd arrived well in advance (and weren't consenting, in return for other considerations from the airline).

 
At 10:57 AM, September 09, 2012 Blogger The Ridger, FCD had this to say...

Exactly. They avoid some of the annoyance, but in the end they're on the same plane as we are - and most importantly, we're on the same plane they are.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Tricky words

president of the bears? which bears?Alexander Golts wrote a wrap-up for the first week in May called "A Soviet Man in the Postmodern Era". It was first published in Yezhednevnyj Zhurnal, but I can't find it on their website, so here's a link to a reprint at Dvizhenie vmeste (Moving together)'s site. It's a pretty biting look at the tandem's takeover of Russia's holidays (including a jab at how the country's honor, so important on Victory Day, doesn't suffer from having so many WWII vets homeless, or as good as), and it has some nice cultural bits for translation students to wrestle with, as well as some syntactic puzzles. Here are two very different things my students struggled with.

First, this description of Putin and Medvedev having a drink with some "ordinary people":
И как апофеоз — тандем возглавляет демонстрацию, типа сливается с народом. Казалось бы, чистое возвращение в СССР, полный ренессанс советской эстетики. Однако все это носило привкус постмодернизма. Слияние с народом продолжилось с пивбаре «Жигули», где компанию тандему составил знатный рабочий со своими знаменитыми варежками.

And as the apofeoz - the tandem led the demonstration, as if 'mingling with the people'. It would seem a perfect return to the USSR, a total rebirth of the Soviet esthetic. However, it all had a little tinge of postmodernism. The mingling with the people continued at the Zhiguli beer bar, where the tandem was joined by (the/a) distinguished worker with his celebrated gloves.
There's a word problem - or a couple. First, апофеоз. Given older Russian F-for-TH, and the loss of the end of Greek words (Pegasus is Pegas, for instance), apofeoz sure looks like "apotheosis", and that is its first meaning. But that doesn't fit the context. If you look in a Russian defining dictionary, you'll find out it also means a "grand finale". The second was cultural - tandem. That term (a masculine, singular noun) tandem bicyclealways refers to the team of Putin & Medvedev. (There's even a word - tandemokratija, rule by the tandem.) Key to its meaning is that a tandem is a team in which one member is in front of the other - like a tandem bicycle.

There was a troubsome phrase - компанию тандему составил (kompaniju tandemu sostavil) - which is one of those things you just have to learn as a unit: составить кому-л. компанию, to join someone, to go along with someone, to keep someone company. Word order was tricky, because the Russian was company to-tandem kept worker, and that sort of thing always throws students (especially when they aren't sure who the tandem is!).

The third problem was purely cultural. Who was it that joined them at the bar?

"The distinguished worker with his famous gloves" - most of them got that far (one lost track of who свой was referring to (it's a possessive that goes to the subject and is obligatory in third person - preventing confusion in sentences of the Tom gave John his book variety - his is a different word depending on whose book it is), and one was led astray by a slang meaning for варежка - mouth. The problem was they didn't realize that this had to mean a specific person.

But if you read that someone was joined by (a/the) "famous singer with his Valery Trapeznikov at a rally wearing his trademark glovescelebrated single glove" or (a/the) "famous gangster with his trademark white fedora", you'd realize you were meant to know who that was. And Russians know who this guy is: Valery Trapeznikov, a "simple working man, like YOU" from Perm, a lathe operator who is also a Duma deputy (equivalent of a congressman), whose machinist's gloves are indeed his trademark.

jacket that looks like a bear
Then there was this tricky bit, simpler at first glance - but not at second:
Главным же событием праздника стал белый медведевский плащик.

The highlight of the holiday was white medvedevsky raincoat.
toy bear wearing a jacket
The first problem here is the word медведевский medvedevskij. It doesn't really mean "bear" - that's медвежий medvezhij. But it's from the same word - Медведев is a surname that's identical to the genitive plural of bear, and the collocation белый медвед belyj medved means "polar bear" - hence (adding Russia's lack of articles) the caption of that picture at the top: "Mooom, who's giving this speech?" "President [Medvedev / of the bears]." "And which bears - polar or brown?"
Medvedev, center, and Putin, right, at a May Day rally, in his white raincoat
But this doesn't mean a polar bear coat, or a polar bear's coat - it means Medvedev's white raincoat. It doesn't help that Russian doesn't capitalize proper adjectives (American, Moscow, Jeffersonian -in Russian, all are with small first letters). The hardest thing to deal with is the word order: in English, a possessive is a determiner and comes first; in Russian, it's just another adjective, and it comes after adjectives of color or quality... We don't say "white Medvedev's raincoat".

All in all, a nice article for intermediate level translators from Russian to work on. A lot of different things in it.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->

Happy Birthday, Siegfried

Sassoon in uniform
Today in Manfield, Kent, England, in 1886 Siegfried Loraine Sassoon was born. One of the great WWI poets, Sassoon eventually rejected the war and refused to return to the front after a convalescent leave, sending a manifesto to Parliament. Refusing to court-martial such a decorated hero and symbol, the Army declared him "unfit for duty" and sent him to a war hospital, to be treated for shell shock. After the war he led a restless life, during which he continued to write, poems and prose both.



Bombardment

Four days the earth was rent and torn
By bursting steel,
The houses fell about us;
Three nights we dared not sleep,
Sweating, and listening for the imminent crash
Which meant our death.

The fourth night every man,
Nerve-tortured, racked to exhaustion,
Slept, muttering and twitching,
While the shells crashed overhead.

The fifth day there came a hush;
We left our holes
And looked above the wreckage of the earth
To where the white clouds moved in silent lines
Across the untroubled blue.

Ancient History

Adam, a brown old vulture in the rain,
Shivered below his wind-whipped olive-trees;
Huddling sharp chin on scarred and scraggy knees,
He moaned and mumbled to his darkening brain;
‘He was the grandest of them all was Cain!
‘A lion laired in the hills, that none could tire:
‘Swift as a stag: a stallion of the plain,
‘Hungry and fierce with deeds of huge desire.’

Grimly he thought of Abel, soft and fair
A lover with disaster in his face,
And scarlet blossom twisted in bright hair.
‘Afraid to fight; was murder more disgrace?’
‘God always hated Cain’ He bowed his head
The gaunt wild man whose lovely sons were dead.


(more of his poems here)

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

     <-- Older Post                     ^ Home                    Newer Post -->